Important New Information on the Pentagon Attack (9/11) to be released around Feb. 9

That wouldn't be permitted unless TPTB are planning to remove the current administration from power.

Are you saying that these guys had better watch their backs?

Excellent! I look forward to seeing the film. Can you tell us yet whether these witnesses all say they saw only ONE plane at the time of the explosion at the Pentagon? And what type of plane(s) did they see?

Some people think they are planning just that...

They have four key witnesses, each one interviewed separately, at the exact location they were at on 9/11. Each one confirms the testimony of the other. They all testify that the large plane (commercial jumbo) flew on the LEFT side of the Citco station, not the right side where the light poles are located. It did NOT hit the Pentagon (but flew over).

Please note that I'm the OP. I'm having proxy server issues, and it appears it didn't register me (but the IDs are the same).

Here's an image explaining the path the witnesses saw:
This image demonstrates the vantage point of the witnesses at the Citgo station the best.

Red line: Official story flight path.
Blue line: Eyewitness flight path.
Yellow lines: Downed light poles.

[link to www.rogerkyoung.com]

i knew it was a setup when that crotchety old coward Rumsfeld was out on the lawn pretending to help with "rescue" efforts


what a fraud

Oh good, another movie cashing in on all the nut cases with welfare money to spend on BS fiction.

God, where can I buy a copy?

I would like your analysis, of how 911 occurred..........

With my avatar, and you still ask,,,,,?

Interesting, but it's still just relying on eyewitness accounts, yeah? I'm not sure if I'd consider that a legitimate smoking gun.

So, a big eagle head crashed into the towers?

Damn you beat me to it. Of course living in New York City it wouldn't be to odd seeing a pigeon or rat that size.

I've had a problem with the "eyewitness" stories all along.

First, the official story is that the plane hit the pentagon at 500+ mph (733.3+ ft/sec). You ever see something go by at 500+ mph at less than 100 feet above the ground? I didn't think so. So if it was going 500+ mph, no "eyewitnesses" in the vicinity were going to ID it as anything but a loud noise and a very indistinct blur. Nobody was going to be IDing the airline or type of plane at the officially stated speed.

Second, unless you've spent time in the the area, you probably don't realize Reagan National Airport is virtually just down the road from the pentagon. There are planes coming in for a landing at an altitude of a few hundred feet or less near the pentagon and the surrounding highways all day long. To look up and see a commercial airliner at a few hundred feet near the pentagon is standard practice for the locals. To assume that "eyewitnesses" looked up and saw a low flying plane and therefore that must have been the plane that hit the pentagon is just plain stupid. It could have easily been just another landing at Reagan National.

The "eyewitness" accounts flunk the smell test on two distinct counts.

They interviewed 13 witnesses, some of them published already, and their stories support this claim.

The ones at the Citco station are interviewed in the same location as on 9/11, and testify that they saw a plane flying in from their left, NOT their right as the government claims. This is NOT eyewitness testimony of something that can be easily confused: a person will remember something as simple as which side of the road a 757 was flying that close to the ground.

Here comes the first woman president. Nancy Pelosi((((SCARY THOUGHT)))) Especially since some of her first words in office were "I am the most powerful woman in the world" To think that she is 2nd in line to the Presidency is flat out frightening....